Lady Colin Campbell and Tom Bower, two of Britain's most connected and relentless royal biographers, have dropped a bombshell that has reignited controversy around the births of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s children, Archie and Lilibet. Their recent revelations point to a carefully constructed narrative filled with inconsistencies, secrecy, and possible fabrications that challenge the official Sussex family story.
.jpg)
According to Lady C and Bower, the birth of Archie, officially announced as occurring at Portland Hospital in London, is riddled with suspicions. Unlike traditional royal births, there were no hospital staff sightings, no media presence or official security details confirming the hospital stay, and a noticeable absence of public hospital steps photos or statements. Some palace insiders now speculate that Archie might not have been born in the UK at all, contradicting the public timeline.
For Lilibet's birth in California, discrepancies in birth certificates and the handling of official documents raise serious concerns. Alterations to timing, the absence of customary hospital announcements, and a high degree of image management suggest that the Sussexes went to great lengths to control the narrative, possibly to conceal surrogacy or other delicate matters.
The pair argue that Harry and Meghan’s brand, heavily funded by multi-million-dollar Netflix deals, could suffer severe financial damage if these allegations gain traction. The secrecy surrounding the births is portrayed as part of a larger Sussex strategy to protect privacy but simultaneously creates distrust and fuels public speculation.
These revelations have sent shockwaves through both royal circles and the media, with debates raging over the legitimacy of the children’s royal status and the Sussexes' transparency.
In summary, Lady Colin Campbell and Tom Bower’s bombshell exposes extensive secrecy, altered records, and possible cover-ups regarding Archie and Lilibet’s births. Their findings challenge the official narrative and raise profound questions about the Sussexes’ handling of royal tradition and public trust.[