Meghan Markle has faced a significant blow as a judge shredded her legal team in the ongoing defamation case brought by her half-sister, Samantha Markle. The dramatic courtroom showdown marks a turning point in Samantha’s relentless effort to sue Meghan for statements made in the 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview and the Netflix series "Harry & Meghan."
.jpg)
Samantha initially sued Meghan for $75,000, claiming that Meghan’s remarks about growing up as an only child damaged her reputation, causing humiliation and public hate. Although Meghan initially won the case when a judge dismissed it in 2024, Samantha appealed, and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals scheduled oral arguments for September 9, 2025.
During the recent hearing, the judge sharply questioned Samantha’s legal team about their failure to adequately challenge the earlier ruling. Chief U.S. Circuit Judge William Pryor criticized the appeal brief, suggesting it lacked clear arguments to overturn the district court’s decision. This judicial skepticism dealt a crushing blow to Samantha’s case.
Samantha’s attorney contended that Meghan’s statements, combined with the Netflix documentary’s portrayal, amounted to defamation by implication, leading to intense public backlash, including death threats against Samantha. However, the court indicated that the appeal did not sufficiently address the legal requirements to sustain the claim.
For Meghan Markle, this ruling strengthens her position, confirming that her descriptions of her upbringing are protected opinions and not actionable defamation. The legal victory is a vital defense in Meghan’s broader effort to maintain her personal narrative amid ongoing family drama and public scrutiny.
In summary, Meghan Markle’s legal team suffered a harsh courtroom setback as the judge criticized their defense against Samantha’s defamation appeal, marking a pivotal moment in the bitter family lawsuit and strengthening Meghan’s defense.Meghan Markle faced a major legal setback as a judge sharply criticized her legal team during the ongoing defamation case brought by her estranged half-sister, Samantha Markle. Samantha’s lawsuit centers on statements Meghan made during the 2021 Oprah Winfrey interview as well as the Netflix series "Harry & Meghan," particularly Meghan’s claim of having grown up as an only child, which Samantha argues was defamatory and caused her significant humiliation and public backlash.[1][4][6]
The $75,000 lawsuit was initially dismissed in 2024 with the judge ruling Meghan’s remarks were opinions rather than false statements. However, Samantha appealed the decision, leading to an oral hearing set for September 2025.
At the recent hearing, the judge expressed strong doubts about Samantha’s legal arguments, pointing out that the appeal failed to adequately address the reasons for the original dismissal. Chief U.S. Circuit Judge William Pryor questioned Samantha’s attorney about whether their appeal properly challenged the lower court’s ruling. The judge’s comments dealt a significant blow to Samantha’s chances of winning the appeal.
Samantha’s legal team argued that Meghan’s comments and the Netflix documentary together created a defamatory impression that fueled harassment and death threats against Samantha. Despite this, the judges were unconvinced by the cumulative defamation argument.
This ruling is a critical win for Meghan Markle, affirming that her personal account of her upbringing is legally protected speech. The case highlights the ongoing public and legal battle within the Markle family, which continues to generate headlines and affect Meghan’s public image.
In summary, Meghan Markle’s legal team was rebuked in court as the defamation appeal brought by Samantha Markle faces a steep uphill battle, marking a key moment in the prolonged family feud and litigation.