Prince Harry and Meghan Markle have found themselves at the center of renewed scrutiny following an investigation into the birth of their son, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor. New details emerging from the examination reveal a series of unusual decisions made by the Sussexes that have fueled controversy and speculation.
.jpg)
Archie was born on May 6, 2019, at Portland Hospital in London—a private maternity hospital known for its discretion and exclusivity. Unlike traditional royal births which involve official announcements and public celebrations, the Sussexes chose a more private and controlled approach. This decision included delaying the public announcement of Archie’s birth, posting the news on social media rather than through royal channels, and limiting press access when they finally introduced Archie.
Further complications arose around Archie's birth certificate. The official document lists Meghan Markle as the mother but omits the signature of the attending doctor, sparking rumors and conspiracy theories about the nature of the birth. Some speculate that surrogacy may have been involved, though these claims remain unproven. Additionally, inconsistencies in the timing and wording of birth announcements contributed to public confusion and mistrust.
Critics argue that the Sussexes’ handling of Archie's birth broke from royal tradition, leading to accusations of secrecy and manipulation. Supporters maintain that their approach was aimed at protecting their child’s privacy in the face of intense media pressure.
The investigation highlights the broader tension between the Sussexes' desire for privacy and the public’s demand for transparency regarding the royal family. As more information surfaces, Harry and Meghan continue to navigate the challenges of modern monarchy while confronting persistent questions about their choices.