Buckingham Palace has recently made a startling decision to remove Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana from official royal history publications, sparking widespread debate and speculation. This move is seen by many royal watchers as a significant statement about the Sussex children’s place in the future of the monarchy.
.jpg)
For years, Archie and Lilibet, the children of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, have been at the center of controversy surrounding their royal titles and public roles. While they were born into the royal family and granted prince and princess titles by King Charles III, their parents’ choice to step back from active royal duties and relocate to the United States has complicated their official recognition in royal narratives.
The decision to omit Archie and Lilibet from key royal history books is understood to be part of a broader effort by the palace to recalibrate the image and composition of the modern monarchy, focusing on those who actively participate in official engagements. Critics have referred to Archie and Lilibet as “ghost kids” because of their absences from royal events and limited public appearances.
This exclusion from royal historiography does not imply revocation of titles but highlights a shift in how the royal family chooses to document and present its lineage and legacy. It reflects a trend toward streamlining the monarchy’s image, emphasizing continuity, duty, and closeness to the crown.
The palace has not issued an official public statement on this specific removal, but insiders suggest it aligns with King Charles III’s vision for a more focused royal family preparing for a post-William era.
In summary, Buckingham Palace’s removal of Archie and Lilibet from royal history books symbolically underscores their ambiguous status within the monarchy and marks a quiet but bold redefinition of royal legacy for the 21st century.