The controversy surrounding Meghan Markle’s youngest son Archie’s birth has taken a dramatic turn, with a surrogate recently confirming claims that Meghan lied about carrying the child herself and accepted money to keep the truth hidden. This latest revelation has reignited intense speculation over the legitimacy of Archie’s birth and questioned the Sussexes' transparency regarding their family.
.jpg)
The surrogate, who has chosen to remain anonymous, reportedly disclosed that Meghan did not physically give birth to Archie but instead used a surrogate pregnancy to welcome the child. Allegations include that Meghan paid the surrogate to maintain silence, fueling accusations of secrecy and deceit.
These claims echo long-standing rumors fueled by Meghan’s estranged family, notably her father Thomas Markle and half-sister Samantha Markle, who allege that within the months leading to Archie’s birth, frozen eggs were involved and that Meghan planned to use surrogacy. Samantha has openly criticized the Sussexes for hiding the surrogacy, asserting that revealing the truth would have been more honest.
Further doubts stem from inconsistencies surrounding Archie’s birth location and timeline. Initial reports suggested Meghan planned a home birth at Frogmore Cottage but Archie was actually born at Portland Hospital in London, far from home. Prince Harry’s memoir mentions they were home shortly after the birth, a scenario that critics find unlikely for a natural delivery.
The royal implications are significant: under British monarchy rules, heirs must be born to a titled royal mother to qualify for succession, so if surrogacy were confirmed, Archie and sister Lilibet could face removal from the line of succession.
Meghan and Harry have not publicly responded to these latest allegations. Meanwhile, Buckingham Palace reportedly demands irrefutable proof of direct birth to uphold Archie’s status.
In summary, a surrogate’s confirmation that Meghan lied about carrying Archie and received money to conceal the truth has deepened the surrogacy controversy, raising legal and royal succession questions that continue to shadow the Sussexes.Meghan Markle is at the center of a stormy controversy as a surrogate has confirmed claims that she lied about carrying Archie herself and accepted payments to keep the truth hidden. The surrogate revealed that Meghan did not physically give birth to Archie Harrison, fueling suspicions that the couple used surrogacy for their first child. This shocking allegation has reignited debate about the authenticity of Archie's birth and the Sussex family’s transparency.[2][4][5][6]
The controversy has long been fueled by estranged family members like Thomas Markle and Samantha Markle, who have suggested surrogacy was involved. Samantha disclosed that her father told her Meghan had collected frozen eggs nine months before Archie’s birth, implying surrogacy was planned all along.
Critics point to inconsistencies in the birth details—while Meghan announced labor seven hours after Archie’s birth, Prince Harry’s memoir states they were home just two hours after the delivery, which many find implausible for a natural birth. Archie was born at Portland Hospital, not the home birth initially planned at Frogmore Cottage, adding to suspicion.
The royal implications are weighty as heirs must be biologically born to titled royal mothers to remain in the line of succession. If surrogacy is confirmed, Archie and his sister Lilibet risk removal from the British royal succession line, causing potential constitutional crises.
Meghan and Prince Harry have yet to publicly address the surrogate’s claims, and Buckingham Palace reportedly demands undeniable proof that Meghan personally gave birth to her children.
In summary, the surrogate’s confirmation that Meghan lied about her pregnancy and paid to hide the truth heightens the surrogacy controversy, raising serious legal and royal implications for the Sussex children’s legitimacy and place in succession.