Angela Levin, a renowned royal biographer and fierce critic of Meghan Markle, continues to voice controversial opinions about the Duchess, raising questions about whether Meghan's actions are driven by a hidden agenda. Levin’s recent comments suggest she believes Meghan may have an underlying strategy that isn’t entirely transparent, fueling speculation among royal watchers.
.jpg)
Levin’s latest critique centers around Meghan’s recent trips, public appearances, and social media posts, which Levin suggests may be part of a larger plan to craft a specific public image—possibly one that aims to elevate her influence beyond her royal duties. Critics argue that Meghan’s visits to high-profile events such as Paris Fashion Week, despite security concerns and controversies surrounding some brands she supports, could be deliberate moves designed to maintain her relevance and expand her brand.
Levin also questions Meghan’s motivations behind her travel choices, notably her decision to attend the Balenciaga show during Paris Fashion Week and her risky engagement in public events in politically sensitive areas like Paris. She rhetorically asks, “Isn’t Paris equally dangerous as London? Why is she risking it?” suggesting that these actions aren’t just about fashion and charity but part of a carefully orchestrated public relations campaign.
Further fueling the controversy, Levin points out Meghan’s silence on troubling issues, such as her father’s fears for her safety and her own security concerns during her travels, contrasting her cautious approach to some events with her outspoken and provocative social media appearances. Levin implies that Meghan’s focus on photo opportunities and headline-grabbing moments might be a strategic effort to dominate media narratives and secure her influence as an influencer and businesswoman.
Most startlingly, Levin claims that Princess Diana would have disapproved of Meghan’s influence on Harry and the damage done to the royal family, suggesting deep familial tensions and that Meghan’s hidden motives could be detrimental to the monarchy’s reputation.
While Meghan’s supporters dismiss Levin’s accusations as biased and unfounded, the controversial claims keep fueling debate about her true intentions. Levin’s assertions raise fundamental questions: Is Meghan Markle genuinely shaping her own legacy, or is she pursuing a hidden agenda to illustrate power, influence, and independence, regardless of royal expectations?
These ongoing allegations highlight how Meghan’s actions remain under intense scrutiny, with critics like Angela Levin suggesting a complex, possibly strategic design behind her high-profile activities—one that could redefine her place within the royal narrative.